I’ve Been Lonely For So Long

I’ve been defending Mick Jagger’s solo records for a long time now, so you must be used to it. Some of them are really good! The only one I don’t like is Primitive Cool. That one sucked. Wandering Spirit is definitely the best one. Mick made some savvy choices of obscure classics to cover. I honestly think his version of I’ve Been Lonely For So Long kicks Frederick Knight’s to the curb. I know in most cases the original is usually better, and anyone with any smarts should aim to be different enough for two (or more) versions to each stand on its own. Well, these two are surely different, but I find the original kind of silly. Maybe I don’t know enough about soul music, but I find the contrast between Knight’s falsetto lead and the deep bass backup singers a bit corny. But that’s just, like, my opinion, man. You could dig it for all you’re worth, that’s fine. But you can’t argue that Mick Jagger sang the hell out of that song. You gotta at least give him points for sheer enthusiasm. We know how much he loves his soul records, and there’s no doubt he had a blast recording this.

I Don’t Mind

What a pretty song, Superheavy. A quiet moment, perfect for a cool autumn day. Because when else is better for being wistful and romantic? Now, ‘wistful and romantic’ is far from my default setting, but neither do I have a heart of stone. Beautiful singing really gets me. If maybe Mick Jagger isn’t the first person who springs to mind when you think of pretty singing, plainly you don’t know Mick. He is one of the most versatile singers I know of, and when he’s being pretty, he’s very very pretty (and his singing is too). Let’s give a hand to Joss Stone, too. I never paid much attention to her before, but if Mick Jagger has picked her for a collaborator, she must be something, right? And she’s held her own. She sounds lovely. Maybe one day I’ll listen to one of her records. Damian Marley’s third verse doesn’t quite fit the mood, but he does offer a bit of humor, and shakes it up a little. All in all, a wonderful song, and again, I can’t recommend Superheavy enough times.

Oh and I guess it’s Skanksgiving, so happy that.

I Can’t Take It No More

Well, it looks like SuperHeavy might be a one-off. I was really hoping they might get it together and do some shows or make more music at least. I might be waiting a while for that. Mick Jagger is going to be kept very busy celebrating that other band of his for at least the next year. The others surely have projects of their own to attend to. I hear Joss Stone has a part on The Tudors, for one. Oh well, supergroups aren’t designed to last, not when everyone involved already has a day job. They got together and did something great, be grateful for that. This song is their second single and there’s supposed to be a video in the pipeline. It rocks and Mick Jagger sounds great. He sounds great on the new Stones single too. It was a hard thing to imagine in 1965, how energized the singer sounds at 69. It sounds like blasphemy to say, but Jagger has become an even better singer than he was back then. And it sounds like he knows and relishes it.

Hide Away

I like Mick Jagger solo, even if it’s with Wyclef or whomever… If Keith doesn’t approve, who cares, it’s still a good song. Keef is just jealous he wasn’t invited.

 

Happy

If any Rolling Stones song is Keith’s official anthem, this one’s it. It’s got his attitude and no coincidence, it’s his best performance as frontman. Now compare the decades-apart life performances. In 1972, the sound is dirty, hard and fast, almost chaotic. In 2006 the same song sounds clean and streamlined, the playing impeccably professional, the venue a new world record in itself. Look at those arthritic old monkeys, hopping about on a stage the size of football field. Conventional wisdom says the old performance has to be superior. Yes, things have changed, but was it for better or worse? Because, for one thing, in 1972 Keith Richards was simply in no condition. It’s supposed to be Keith’s big number, but the focus is steadfastly on the irresistible spectacle of Mick Jagger’s arse. Mick’s not hogging the spotlight, he’s just taking up the slack – Keith, eyes rolled back and teeth missing, can barely cough out the chorus. By 2006, though, he’s earned his full three minutes of solo spotlight. In his book, he noted with pride his ongoing improvement as a singer, and you have to notice it – the old devil’s gotten way better in front of the microphone. Say what you will about aging rock stars with more money than God commanding two-million-member audiences, but this time around Keith’s actually conscious for his big number, and relishing it.

 

Hang On To Me Tonight

I’m currently in a state of extreme cynicism about love and romance. There’s no such thing as true love, it seems like, there’s only lust and delusion. Forever alone looks like a better option than getting stuck with another wrong choice, or settling for barely adequate. I’m not going to bore you with my niggling romantic discontent – I’ve got another blog for that – but my latest bruising has faded to a dull ache and I need a refresher. But all that doesn’t mean I don’t still appreciate a good love song. I’ve still got feelings, you know. I still want the love song to be true, even if it’s a sad one. Somebody (eh, Mick Jagger) wrote this about finding and losing and longing and missing and holding on, and I can relate to that, but I want to relate to it more.

Half a Loaf

So about all those solos. I still maintain She’s the Boss was pretty good. Not great, but to me still better than other ‘ha-ha suckers I’m going solo’ projects released the same year by Sting, Phil Collins, Freddie Mercury and Roger Daltrey. I just found out (via Keith Richards and his Life) that Jagger had secretly piggybacked an agreement for x solo records onto The Stones’ record contract and made plans to tour and record without telling anybody. A dick move by any standards, made worse by cavalier statements to the press calling The Stones ‘a millstone’. Richards, for one, can barely contain his glee that Jagger’s little records failed to launch him into a solo career far surpassing anything he’d achieved before. That may have had less to do with the quality of the records, which aren’t any worse, like I’ve just said, than anybody else’s such attempts. You just can’t surpass being in The World’s Greatest Rock’n'Roll Band, there’s nowhere left to go but back down. There’s a glass ceiling on how big of a star you can be, and Mick Jagger was already a star of the biggest possible magnitude. Sure, Phil Collins’ solo career far surpassed the achievements of Genesis (not in quality, obviously) because Genesis never sold very many records. Jagger may have pulled it off if he’d gone solo in 1968, but by the time he did try, his image was just too deeply entrenched to be changed much. How much you enjoy the work itself depends entirely on whether you were a  Mick Jagger fan in the first place, and what exactly it was you were getting out of The Rolling Stones. If half the joy of The Stones was watching Mick prance around and listening to his voice and perving out over his physique, then you’ll probably dig those same things in a slightly different context. If you’re more interested in the musicianship and raw energy of the band as a whole, or a guitar-worshiper who loves Keith Richards more, then you’ll agree with Keith’s assessments and stay far, far away. It’s up to you, really.

Half a Loaf

Life

Keith Richards’ autobiography has rocketed to the top of my favorite Stones books list, with good reason. It’s not like other celebrity memoirs, not written to make a buck, grind an axe, or make the author look good. It doesn’t have the anonymous bland tone that signals the hand of the ghostwriter. It takes off in a chatty conversational voice that is unmistakably Keith, and it shows, over 550 pages, what it’s like to be Keith. That’s an epic achievement in itself. Keith Richards has always cut a mysterious and slightly terrifying figure. Always on the run from the law, knife in boot, weaseling out of one scrape after another while all around him his associates drop like flies. Did he sell his soul to the devil? Ineffably cool, but not exactly likable. Well, now he’s managed to make himself very likable indeed, by making no apologies about his badness.

Life is no tour guide to rock star depravity. It’s a love story – between Keith and his music. It runs throughout the book, an undimmed, unabashed, joyful enthusiasm for all things musical. Keith Richards really fucking digs his job, and he’s never stopped being amazed at his success. Not his popularity or ability to fill stadiums, but just the ability to play and write songs and make great music and earn the respect of other musicians. There are constant long asides about the technicalities of guitar heroism, stuff about tuning and strings and dropped chords. As a non-musician, I’ve never understood the significance of those things, and this is the closest I’ve ever come to grasping it. It’s the best window on how those famous sounds came to be. That alone makes the old devil immensely sympathetic. Also, his disinterest in repeating the sordid old anecdotes. There’s some juicy bits there, all right, but they’re not the point. The notorious pissing on the wall incident doesn’t even merit a mention. Richards isn’t interested in what’s been talked to death already, he wants to tell the stories he thinks are important. Like a daring rainbound cat rescue, a childhood accident with a rock, or how he met his wife’s family for the first time. The death of Brian Jones is dealt with in a few lines – he’d been written off as a goner long before he took that fateful midnight swim – while the deaths of Ian Stewart, Gram Parsons, and Keith’s mother are given full requiem.

Besides music, the other long running love story is the one with Mick Jagger, of course. The notorious Glimmer Twins who used to be thick as thieves are now barely cordial, to Keith’s eternal chagrin. Mick Jagger has changed, not for the better, thinks Keith, while Keith has stayed steadfastly the same. It was Marianne Faithfull, in her own memoir, who called it out that those two were really the loves of each others lives. What I think we have here is the kind of passionate romantic friendship that used to flourish among the Victorians, a Platonic union stronger and more important than any marriage or sexual relationship. Each party complains bitterly about the other’s shortcomings, accusations of betrayal fly, sometimes blows are exchanged, but they always come back to each other. Keith repeatedly complains that Mick is jealous and hostile, actively trying to block potential ‘rivals’, but he seems unaware that his own criticism of Mick, Mick’s personality and Mick’s solo work comes off more like the bitterness of a neglected spouse than any valid point being made. The shocking and much publicized denigration of Jagger’s manhood does occur, but the context is more interesting than the slur itself. In the same paragraph Keith claims not to care about Mick’s affair with Anita Pallenberg on the set of Performance, brags about nailing Marianne and suggests that Donald Cammell’s suicide was good riddance. Reading between the lines, it’s clear the betrayal stung and stings still. The low blow is just a jab of payback. It’s a tragedy, according Keith Richards, that Mick Jagger had to grow up and become the monstrous ego demon “Mick Jagger.” After all those years and ups and downs, he’s still missing the kid on the train with the blues records.

Jagger has become the “Jagger” we know and love. He grew out of his blues purism and his stance against the world, accepted his knighthood, let the flattery and flashbulbs go to his head, and runs The Rolling Stones like a well-oiled money making machine. Richards has stayed the same blues-obsessed outlaw who goes to sleep hugging his guitar. He’s the one who exults in the honor of being allowed to jam with the locals in Jamaica, or the honor of playing with obscure but brilliant sidemen who haven’t seen the spotlight since the fifties. Jagger is delighted to have Wyclef Jean as a collaborator. Richards thinks it’s an honor to write with Tom Waits. They used to be The Glimmer Twins, now two more opposite men cannot be found, but together they still manage to form one badass entity called The Rolling Stones. Mick Jagger reveals bits of himself in his songs, but he will probably never open up and tell his side of the story. Thank God Keith Richards is open-hearted enough to share his life with us.

Had It With You

I love you, dirty fucker
sister and a brother
moaning in the moonlight
singing for your supper
‘cos i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
You always seem to haunt me
always try to haunt me
serving out injuctions
shouting out instructions
but i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
And i love you with a passion
in and out of fashion
always got behind you
when others tried to blind you
but i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
It is such a sad thing
to watch a good love die
i’ve had it up to here babe
i’ve got to say goodbye
‘cos i had it i had it i had it with you
and i had it i had it i had it with you
Loved you in the lean years
loved you in the fat ones
you’re a mean mistreater
you’re a dirty dirty rat scum
i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it i had it i had it with you
i had it with you
i had it with you
i had it with you………

According to Keith: “That’s the kind of mood I was in. I wrote ‘Had It With You’ in Ronnie’s front room in Chiswick, right on the banks of the Thames. We were waiting to go back to Paris, but the weather was so dodgy that we were stranded until the Dover ferry started rolling again [...] There was no heating, and the only way to keep warm was to turn up the amps. I don’t think I’d ever written a song before, apart from maybe “All About You,” in which I realized I was actually singing about Mick.”

There you have Dirty Work, an album primarily interesting as a document of the torn and frayed partnership of the former Glimmer Twins. As I suspected, Keith’s book provides deep insight into how and why (Keith thinks) the Jagger/Richards team went inseparable to barely on speaking terms. It’s because Mick Jagger is so selfish and full of himself, evidently. What Mick’s side of the story is, we’ll probably never really know, but I imagine he would say something about what an incorrigible, unreliable, unprofessional, drunk-addicted wreck Keith spent most of his life being.  Then Keith would call Mick a vain, jet-setting, trend-hopping fashion victim. Then maybe there’d be a fistfight. It’s clear to see why they live on different continents now. Obviously, The Rolling Stones are an entity much greater than the sum of its parts. Alone, Mick is all like “let’s go to the biggest most expensive studio with all the most famous people!” and Keith is like “let’s just jam in my garage for a while and drink whiskey.” As their solo records attest, neither approach is all that good. But together, they can have that jamming-in-the-garage-with-whiskey vibe, and have the biggest and best studio, and bring in the most famous people or the best, most obscure people and be the best of both worlds.

Gunface

The Stones being hardcore and urban in their golden years. All part of their sporadic interest in criminality and violence. Even in 1997 the boys could still get hip. This is the closest to a hip-hop beat they’ve ever come to, and with their usual verve and aggression. Bridges To Babylon has some really bright moments. The whole thing does sag on the second half, due to an unwise sequencing of three very long and slow sad ballads all in a row at the end. There’s also some heartfelt and poetic lyrics, but not in this song. This is your typical moment of Mick Jagger imagining himself to be a violent criminal. (Keith Richards actually is a violent criminal, famously armed to the teeth, so no need for him to imagine anything.) Now generally, violent lyrics about teaching people (especially girls) a lesson are a disturbing turnoff, but such macho posturing from someone as effeminate and pampered as Jagger is kind of adorable. Jagger has gotten away with a lot of nasty lyrics about whipping slaves and slashing throats without coming off like an irredeemable asshole because it’s so clearly a campy fantasy and he’d never dream of knifing anyone, for fear of getting blood on his trousers. Richards is another story; he’d easily knife and shoot you, but only if provoked and he’s not the one prancing around singing about it.

Previous Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 156 other followers